Edward G. Rahll & Sons, Inc. v. Zach et al

Filing 36

ORDER directing Clrk of Ct to docket fax from deft Zach as status rpt, noting fax adequately discharges obligation to inform ct of status of production efforts imposed upon deft Zach by Para 2b of order 35 of 11/20/08, & directing that, in event defts unable to complete production of docs by 12/4/08, they shall promptly notify ct in acc w/ Para 6 of order 35 . (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 12/03/08. (ki)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EDWARD G. RAHLL & SONS, INC., Plaintiff v. SHAWN ZACH and KIM ZACH, d/b/a ZACH'S PRODUCE Defendants : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-1384 (Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of December, 2008, upon consideration of the order of court (Doc. 35) dated November 20, 2008, which required pro se defendants to produce certain business records to plaintiff's counsel on or before December 4, 2008, and instructed them to apprise the court of the progress of production efforts as of November 28, 2008, and upon further consideration of the letter received from defendant Shawn Zach ("Zach") via facsimile on the latter date, which represents that defendants have instructed their accountant to compile and produce pertinent business records, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of Court is instructed to docket the facsimile received from defendant Zach as a status report. The facsimile adequately discharges the obligation to inform the court of the status of production efforts imposed upon defendant Zach by Paragraph 2.b of the order (Doc. 35) dated November 20, 2008. 2. 3. In the event that defendants are unable to complete production of documents by December 4, 2008, they shall promptly notify the court in accordance with Paragraph 6 of the order (Doc. 35) dated November 20, 2008. S/ Christopher C. Conner CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?