U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Healy et al

Filing 123

ORDER deeming motion by Receiver requesting ct approve prop claims procedure & plan of distribution of assets 121 unopposed, GRANTING said motion & setting forth specific instructions & authorizations re: same... (see Paras 2a-d for specifics). (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 12/03/10. (ki)

Download PDF
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Healy et al Doc. 123 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-1330 : : (Judge Conner) : v. : : SEAN NATHAN HEALY, : Defendant : : and : : SHALESE RANIA HEALY and : SAND DOLLAR INVESTING : PARTNERS, LLC, : Relief Defendants : --------------------------------------------------------------------------U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-1331 TRADING COMMISSION, : Plaintiff : (Judge Conner) : v. : : SEAN NATHAN HEALY, : Defendant : : and : : SHALESE RANIA HEALY and : SAND DOLLAR INVESTING : PARTNERS, LLC, : Relief Defendants : ORDER AND NOW, this 2nd day of December, 2010, upon consideration of the motion (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Healy, Civ. A. No. 1:09-CV1330 (M.D. Pa. filed July 12, 2009) [hereinafter Case No. 1330], Doc. 121; U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Healy, Civ. A. No. 1:09-CV-1331 (M.D. Dockets.Justia.com Pa filed July 12, 2009) [hereinafter Case No. 1331], Doc. 118), filed by the courtappointed receiver, Melanie E. Damian, Esq. (the "Receiver"), wherein the Receiver requests that the court approve her proposed claims procedure and plan of distribution of assets recovered by the Estate, and upon further consideration of the Order of Court (Case No. 1330, Doc. 122; Case No. 1331, Doc. 119) dated November 16, 2010, directing any party who opposes the relief sought in the Receiver's motion (Case No. 1330, Doc. 121; Case No. 1331, Doc. 118) to file a brief in opposition to the motion on or before November 30, 2010, and it appearing that, as of the date of this Order, no party has filed a brief in opposition, see L.R. 7.6, and it further appearing that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission do not oppose the relief sought in the Receiver's motion, and that the relief requested is in the best interests of the Receivership Estate, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The motion (Case No. 1330, Doc. 121; Case No. 1331, Doc. 118) is DEEMED unopposed. See L.R. 7.6. The motion (Case No. 1330, Doc. 121; Case No. 1331, Doc. 118) is GRANTED. a. The claims administration process and plan of distribution proposed in the motion (Case No. 1330, Doc. 121; Case No. 1331, Doc. 118) are approved in their entirety. The forms of the "Legal Notice of Claims Administration Process and Plan of Distribution" and the "Proof of Claim and Release," proposed in and attached as exhibits to the motion (Case No. 1330, Doc. 121; Case No. 1331, Doc. 118), are approved. 2. b. 2 c. The Receiver is authorized to mail the claims package, in the form proposed in the motion (Case No. 1330, Doc. 121; Case No. 1331, Doc. 118), including the "Legal Notice of Claims Administration Process and Plan of Distribution" and the "Proof of Claim and Release," to all eligible claimants (as defined in the motion). The Receiver is authorized to commence the claims administration process forthwith. d. S/ Christopher C. Conner CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?