U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Healy et al

Filing 150

ORDER re: 9th motion for order auth pymt of fees & expenses 148 - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Motion 148 is DEEMED unopposed. 2. Motion 148 is GRANTED - ct approves full amt of fees & costs req'd & auth pymt of 80% of fees sought & full amt of costs sought as follows... (see Paras 2a-c for specifics). (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 12/08/11. (ki)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

U.S. SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff

:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-1330
:
:
(Judge Conner)
:
v.
:
:
SEAN NATHAN HEALY,
:
Defendant
:
:
and
:
:
SHALESE RANIA HEALY and
:
SAND DOLLAR INVESTING
:
PARTNERS, LLC,
:
Relief Defendants
:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-1331
TRADING COMMISSION,
:
Plaintiff
:
(Judge Conner)
:
v.
:
:
SEAN NATHAN HEALY,
:
Defendant
:
:
and
:
:
SHALESE RANIA HEALY and
:
SAND DOLLAR INVESTING
:
PARTNERS, LLC,
:
Relief Defendants
:
ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of December, 2011, upon consideration of the ninth
motion for an order authorizing payment of fees and expenses (U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission v. Healy, Civ. A. No. 1:09-CV-1330 (M.D. Pa. filed July 12,
2009) [hereinafter Case No. 1330], Doc. 145; U.S. Commodity Futures Trading

Commission v. Healy, Civ. A. No. 1:09-CV-1331 (M.D. Pa filed July 12, 2009)
[hereinafter Case No. 1331], Doc. 148), filed by the court-appointed receiver,
Melanie E. Damian, Esq. (the “receiver”), and upon further consideration of the
order of court (Case No. 1330, Doc. 146; Case No. 1331, Doc. 149) dated November
17, 2011, directing defendant and/or relief defendants to file a brief in opposition to
the receiver’s motion (Case No. 1330, Doc. 145; Case No. 1331, Doc. 148) on or before
December 1, 2011, and it appearing that, as of the date of this order, neither
defendant nor relief defendants have filed a brief in opposition, see L.R. 7.6, and it
further appearing that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission do not oppose the relief sought in the
receiver’s motion, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.

The motion (Case No. 1330, Doc. 145; Case No. 1331, Doc. 148) is
DEEMED unopposed. See L.R. 7.6.

2.

The motion (Case No. 1330, Doc. 145; Case No. 1331, Doc. 148) is
GRANTED. The court hereby approves the full amount of fees and
costs requested and authorizes payment of eighty percent (80%) of the
fees sought and the full amount of costs sought as follows:
a.

$ 13,509.20 for fees and $ 58.58 for costs to the receiver and
Damian & Valori, LLP; and

b.

$ 145.60 for fees and $ 31.38 for costs to Semanoff Ormsby
Greenberg & Torchia, LLC; and

c.

$25.00 for costs to Bissell Web Design.

S/ Christopher C. Conner
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
United States District Judge