Fisher v. Matthews et al

Filing 36

ORDER AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2011, upon careful and independent consideration of the defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 17), and all responses and replies thereto, and after review of the thorough and well- reasoned Report a nd Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt 26 , it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The defendants objections to the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 31) are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; and 3. Defendants' mtn for S/J is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Lawrence F. Stengel on 5/20/11 (jc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THOMAS M. FISHER,
Plaintiff

MICHAEL MATTHEWS and
SHAUN DICKMYER
Defendants

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 09-1572

ORDER

AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2011, upon careful and independent
consideration of the defendants= motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 17), and all
responses and replies thereto, and after review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report
and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt (Doc. # 26), it
is hereby ORDERED that:
1.

The defendants’ objections to the report and recommendation of the United
States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 31) are OVERRULED;

2.

The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

3.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ LAWRENCE F. STENGEL
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.