Deffibaugh v. Harvey et al

Filing 88

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs objections are OVERRULED; 2. Defendants John Brown, John Stchur, Jeffrey Watson, and Willard Oliphants objections are SUSTAINED; 3. The report an d recommendation is ADOPTED in part and REJECTED in part, consistent with this Order; 4. Defendants motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 41, 44, & 50) are GRANTED in their entirety; 5) The Clerk is directed to mark this case CLOSED.Signed by Honorable Lawrence F. Stengel on 9/19/13. (jc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALAN T. DEFFIBAUGH,

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Plaintiff,
v.
DWIGHT HARVEY, et. al.,
Defendants.

Civil Action
No. 1:09-1749

ORDER
AND NOW, this 19th day of September 2013, upon consideration of plaintiff’s
objections to the report and recommendation (Doc. Nos. 82 & 83), defendant Dwight
Harvey’s response thereto (Doc. No. 84), defendant Stacy Gelvin’s response thereto
(Doc. No. 85), and defendants John Brown, John Stchur, Jeffrey Watson, and Willard
Oliphant’s objections to the report and recommendation (Doc. Nos. 77 & 78), and
following an independent review of the entire record and applicable law in this matter, IT
IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff’s objections are OVERRULED;

2.

Defendants John Brown, John Stchur, Jeffrey Watson, and Willard

Oliphant’s objections are SUSTAINED;
3.

The report and recommendation is ADOPTED in part and REJECTED in

part, consistent with this Order;
4.

Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 41, 44, & 50) are

GRANTED in their entirety;

5.

The Clerk is directed to mark this case CLOSED
BY THE COURT
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

2