Cieniawa v. White et al
Filing
16
ORDER denying plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 12 . (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 12/08/09. (ki)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JASON CIENIAWA, Plaintiff v. DR. DENTIST DAVID WHITE, et al., Defendants
: : : : : : : : :
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-2130 (Judge Conner)
ORDER AND NOW, this 8th day of December, 2009, upon consideration of plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel (Doc. 12), and it appearing that, at this juncture of the litigation, that plaintiff is capable of proceeding on his own and that review of the claims reveals that they implicate neither complex legal or factual issues nor require factual investigation or the testimony of expert witnesses, see Tabron v. Grace, 6 F.3d 147, 155-57 (3d Cir. 1993) (listing factors relevant to request for counsel), it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's motion (Doc. 12) is DENIED. If further proceedings demonstrate the need for counsel, the matter will be reconsidered either sua sponte or upon motion of plaintiff. See id.
S/ Christopher C. Conner CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
