Dillsburg Ventures, LLC v. Carroll Township

Filing 115

ORDER granting motion to defer ruling on motion for jdgmt on pleadings 114 , deferring ruling on deft's pending motion for jdgmt on pleadings 107 until after 10/7/16, directing parties to file joint status rpt by 10/7/16 apprising ct of stat us of settlement discussions..., & directing Clrk of Ct to admin term pending motion 107 w/out prejudice to reinstate @ close of settlement negotiations. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 8/15/16. (ki)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DILLSBURG VENTURES, LLC, : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff v. CARROLL TOWNSHIP, Defendant CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-275 (Chief Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 15th day of August, 2016, upon consideration of the parties’ concurred motion (Doc. 114) to defer ruling on defendant’s motion (Doc. 107) for judgment on the pleadings pending conclusion of the parties’ renewed settlement negotiations, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The parties’ concurred motion (Doc. 114) is GRANTED. 2. The court will defer its ruling on defendant’s pending motion (Doc. 107) for judgment on the pleadings until after October 7, 2016. 3. The parties shall file a joint status report on or before October 7, 2016, apprising the court of the status of their settlement negotiations and whether the court’s ruling on defendant’s pending motion (Doc. 107) for judgment on the pleadings should remain deferred. 4. The Clerk of Court shall administratively terminate defendant’s pending motion (Doc. 107) for judgment on the pleadings without prejudice to reinstatement of said motion at the close of the parties’ settlement negotiations. /S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?