Thrower v. Warden USP MCCreary et al

Filing 7

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice & directing Clrk of Ct to close file. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 09/21/10. (ki)

Download PDF
Thrower v. Warden USP MCCreary et al Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: Thrower v. Warden, USP McCreary, et al. William Thrower 71302-053 Inmate: ID Number: : : : : : : CIVIL NO. 1:CV-10-1431 (Judge Conner) ORDER On July 12, 2010, William Thrower, an inmate currently confined at the Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Springfield, Missouri, filed a civil rights complaint without submitting a filing fee or the forms required to proceed in forma pauperis in a civil rights case. By Administrative Order dated July 13, 2010, the Plaintiff was informed that this case would be dismissed without prejudice unless, within thirty (30) days, he either paid the statutory filing fee of $350.00 or filed a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis and an authorization form. On August 17, 2010, the Plaintiff submitted a request for additional in forma pauperis forms, stating that he had been separated from his legal papers. On that same day, we re-mailed the July 13, 2010 Administrative Order, including an application to proceed in forma pauperis and an authorization form, and gave the Plaintiff an additional thirty (30) days either to pay the $350.00 filing fee or to complete and return the forms. Dockets.Justia.com Thirty (30) days have elapsed and the Plaintiff has neither made an appropriate submission nor requested an extension of time in which to do so. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT this action is dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court shall close this file. S/ Christopher C. Conner CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge DATE: September 21, 2010 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?