Gross v. R.T. Reynolds, Inc. et al

Filing 57

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, ORDER DISMISSING CASE, Motions terminated - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1) Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc Nos. 36 & 48) are GRANTED, the Court having declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's b reach of contract claim asserted in Count Two of the Amended Complaint. 2) Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 38) is DISMISSED as moot. 3) The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. See Order for further details. Signed by Honorable Lawrence F. Stengel on 9/22/11. (Attachments: # 1 Order)(aaa)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARTIN GROSS,
Plaintiff
v.
R.T. REYNOLDS, et al.,
Defendants

:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 10-2380

ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2011, upon careful consideration of
defendants’ motions to dismiss (Document Nos. 36, 38, and 48), plaintiff’s briefs in
opposition to the motions to dismiss (Document Nos. 49 and 51), and defendant’s reply
brief (Document No. 52), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

Defendants’ motions to dismiss (Document Nos. 36 and 48) are

GRANTED, the Court having declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over
plaintiff’s breach of contract claim asserted in Count Two of the Amended Complaint.
2.

Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Document No. 38) is DISMISSED as

3.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED.

moot.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel ____

LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.