Bryant et al v. Vernoski

Filing 60

ORDER AND NOW, this 4th day of April, 2012, upon consideration of the Plaintiffs Motion to Amend/Correct 46 and Defendants Response thereto 49 , it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion is DENIED.Signed by Honorable Lawrence F. Stengel on 4/4/12. (jc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LINDA G. BRYANT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WILLIAM VERNOSKI, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : Civil Action No. No. 11-263 ORDER AND NOW, this 4th day of April, 2012, upon consideration of the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend/Correct (Doc. No. 46) and Defendant’s Response thereto (Doc. No. 49), it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/LAWRENCE F. STENGEL LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?