Joseph v. Asure et al

Filing 47

ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 46 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED; Dfts 36 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED with respect to Pltf's Eighth Amendment claims; Pltf's 40 Motion to Dismiss Dfts' mtn for sumjgm is DENIED; The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case.Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on Aug. 21, 2012. (sc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GEORGE JOSEPH, Plaintiff v. WARDEN DONNA ASURE, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01255 (Chief Judge Kane) (Magistrate Judge Smyser) ORDER Presently pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge Smyser’s Report and Recommendation that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted with respect to Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims and that Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be denied. (Doc. No. 46.) No timely objections have been filed. ACCORDINGLY, on this 21st day of August 2012, upon review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Magistrate Judge Smyser’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 46) is ADOPTED; 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 36) is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims; 3. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 40) is DENIED; 4. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3), the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claims; and 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. s/ Yvette Kane Yvette Kane, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?