McWilliams v. Mazurkiewicz et al

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS/ORDER STAYING CASE/ORDER REFERRING CASE - AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2012, upon con. of the R&R 16 of Mag. Judge Carlson, to which no objs. were filed...ORDERED that: 1. The R&R 16 is adopted. 2. Petn r.'s mtn. to stay proceedings 14 is GRANTED. This matter is STAYED and HELD IN ABEYANCE, pend. completion of the state PCRA litigation...3. The parties are dir. to provide status reports concerning the progress of the state PCRA litigation every 90 days. 4. This case is remanded to the Mag. Judge for further proceedings, including a R&R on dispositive mtns. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 5/10/12. (am, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CARL D. MCWILLIAMS, Petitioner v. JOSEPH MAZURKIEWICZ, et al., Respondents : : : : CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-1786 : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2012, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 16) of Magistrate Judge Carlson, to which no objections were filed, and upon independent review of the record, the court finds no error in the R&R and concludes that the R&R should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The R&R (Doc. 16) is adopted. 2. Petitioner’s motion to stay proceedings (Doc. 14) is GRANTED. This matter is STAYED and HELD IN ABEYANCE, pending completion of the state PCRA litigation, and without prejudice to Respondents later asserting any available statute of limitations defenses in response to the petition, after the stay is vacated. 3. The parties are directed to provide status reports concerning the progress of the state PCRA litigation every 90 days. 4. This case is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings, including a report and recommendation on dispositive motions. /s/ William W. Caldwell William W. Caldwell United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?