Ball v. Sipe et al
Filing
76
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION is ADOPTED. Dfts' 61 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Pltf's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THE CASE. 71 Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on June 25, 2012. (sc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DAWN MARIE BALL,
Plaintiff
v.
SIPE, et al.,
Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civil No. 1:11-CV-1830
(Chief Judge Kane)
(Magistrate Judge Carlson)
ORDER
THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:
On April 4, 2012, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Dawn Marie Ball’s
complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 61.)
Magistrate Judge Martin Carlson issued a Report and Recommendation on May 31, 2012, in
which he recommended that this Court grant the motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint with
prejudice for failure to state a claim. (Doc. No. 71.) Plaintiff was directed to file any objections
to the Report and Recommendation on or before June 18, 2012. (Id.) To date, Plaintiff has
failed to raise any objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has reviewed
Magistrate Judge Carlson’s Report and Recommendation and detects no error therein.
ACCORDINGLY, on this 25th day of June 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT
the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 71) is ADOPTED, Defendants’ motion to dismiss
(Doc. No. 61) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.
S/ Yvette Kane
Yvette Kane, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?