DEEN-MITCHELL v. LAPPIN et al

Filing 200

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT 199 of Magistrate Judge Carlson, DISMISSING matter due to pltf's failure to pay filing fee, & directing Clrk of Ct to CLOSE case. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 10/18/19. (ki)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WALLACE DEEN-MITCHELL, Plaintiff v. HARLEY G. LAPPIN and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-1902 (Chief Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 18th day of October, 2019, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 199) of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson, recommending that the court dismiss the above-captioned matter for failure to pay the filing fee, and it appearing that no party has not objected to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and the court noting that failure of a party to timely object to a magistrate judge’s conclusions “may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level,” Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)), but that, as a matter of good practice, a district court should afford “reasoned consideration” to the uncontested portions of the report, E.E.O.C. v. City of Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Henderson, 812 F.2d at 879), in order to “satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record,” FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, and, following an independent review of the record, the court being in agreement with Judge Carlson’s recommendation, and concluding that there is no clear error on the face of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The report (Doc. 199) of Magistrate Judge Carlson is ADOPTED. 2. The above-captioned matter is DISMISSED due to plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee. 3. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. /S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?