Culver v. Specter et al
Filing
270
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), 221 228 216 254 214 231 - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:1. Plaintiffs motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 214, 216) are deniedwithout prejudice. 2. Plaintif fs motion for administrative order compelling medical records from Dr. Chung (Doc. No. 221) is granted only to the extent that within ten (10) days the Corrections Defendants shall advise the Court as to whether they are in possession of records from Dr. Chung concerning the evaluation and/or treatment of Plaintiff. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue one (1) subpoena to Plaintiff for his use in the course of discovery in this case. 4. The Clerk shall complete the caption and case number on the blank subpoena form. 5. Plaintiff is directed to file certificates of service with the Court for the subpoena he serves, and to return to the Clerk of Court any unused subpoenas no more than ten (10) days after the termination of this lawsuit.Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 9/30/2014. SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. (sc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BRETT T. CULVER,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES SPECTER, et al.,
Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL NO. 1:CV-11-2205
(Judge Kane)
ORDER
NOW, THIS 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014, in accordance with the
accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1.
Plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 214, 216) are denied
without prejudice.
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for administrative order compelling medical records from Dr.
Chung (Doc. No. 221) is granted only to the extent that within ten (10) days the
Corrections Defendants shall advise the Court as to whether they are in
possession of records from Dr. Chung concerning the evaluation and/or treatment
of Plaintiff. If so, they are to provide a copy of said records to Plaintiff within ten
(10) days. If not, Plaintiff may utilize a subpoena in attempting to obtain these
records.
3.
The Clerk of Court is directed to issue one (1) subpoena to Plaintiff for his use in
the course of discovery in this case.
4.
The Clerk shall complete the caption and case number on the blank subpoena
form.
5.
Plaintiff is directed to file certificates of service with the Court for the subpoena
he serves, and to return to the Clerk of Court any unused subpoenas no more than
ten (10) days after the termination of this lawsuit.
6.
Plaintiff’s motion for administrative order compelling the Schuykill County trial
transcript (Doc. No. 228) is granted only to the extent that within ten (10) days
the Defendants shall advise the Court as to whether they are in possession of the
trial transcript. If so, they are to provide a copy of the transcript to Plaintiff
within ten (10) days. If Defendants do not have the transcript and certify to
Plaintiff that they will not be obtaining it, Plaintiff may renew his request with
this Court by filing a new motion.
7.
Plaintiff’s motion to stay proceedings (Doc. No. 231) is denied.
8.
Corrections Defendants’ motion for extension of time to conduct discovery is
granted to the following extent. All discovery shall be completed by the parties
within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. Any dispositive motions shall
be filed within thirty (30) days thereof.
9.
Corrections Defendants’ motion to compel (Doc. No. 254) is granted to the
following extent. If Defendants have possession of Dr. Chung’s records and
provide them to Plaintiff, Plaintiff shall supplement his responses to
Interrogatories 3-5 and Requests for Production of Documents 6-8 within twenty
(20) days from his receipt of the records. If Plaintiff intends to use Dr. Jageman
as an expert at any trial, he shall also supplement his responses to these same
discovery requests within twenty (20) days from the date of this order.
S/ Yvette Kane
YVETTE KANE, District Judge
Middle District of Pennsylvania
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?