Florez v. Strada
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Judge Mannion 9 , DENYING petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 , & directing Clrk of Ct to CLOSE case. (See order for complete details.)Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 1/10/13. (ki)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HENRY FLOREZ,
Petitioner
v.
FRANK STRADA, Warden, F.C.I
ALLENWOOD,
Respondent
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-2300
(Judge Conner)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2013, upon consideration of the Report and
Recommendation of United States Judge Malachy E. Mannion (Doc. 9), recommending
that the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) be denied, and, following an
independent review of the record, and noting that petitioner filed objections1 to the
report on December 10, 2012 (Doc. 10), and the court finding Judge Mannion’s analysis to
be thorough and well-reasoned, and the court finding petitioner’s objections to be
without merit and squarely addressed by Judge Mannion’s report (Doc. 9), it is hereby
ORDERED that:
1.
The Report and Recommendation of Judge Mannion (Doc. 9) are
ADOPTED.
1
Where objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation are
filed, the court must perform a de novo review of the contested portions of the
report. Supinski v. United Parcel Serv., Civ. A. No. 06-0793, 2009 WL 113796, at *3
(M.D. Pa. Jan. 16, 2009) (citing Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1106 n. 3 (3d Cir.
1989); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c)). “In this regard, Local Rule of Court 72.3 requires
‘written objections which . . . specifically identify the portions of the proposed
findings, recommendations or report to which objection is made and the basis for
those objections.’” Id. (citing Shields v. Astrue, Civ. A. No. 07-417, 2008 WL
4186951, at *6 (M.D. Pa. Sept. 8, 2008)).
2.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.
3.
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
S/ Christopher C. Conner
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?