Roulhac v. Lawler et al

Filing 81

ORDER: 1. The magistrate judges report 80 is ADOPTED.2. Dfts mtns to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment 54 and 61 are both GRANTED.3. Pltfs complaint 1 and his amended complaint 45 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE against all remaining dfts. Leave to amend the claims will be denied as futile.4. The Clerk of Court shall close this file.Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 08/06/14. (ma)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PAUL KHALIFAH ROULHAC,
Plaintiff
v.
R.M. LAWLER, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
: CIVIL NO. 1:12-cv-0311
:
:
:

ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of August, 2014, upon consideration of the report
and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Schwab (Doc. 80), filed July 16, 2014, to
which no objections were filed, and upon independent review of the record, it is ordered
that:
1. The magistrate judge’s report (Doc. 80) is ADOPTED.
2. Defendants’ motions to dismiss or, in the alternative, for
summary judgment (Docs. 54, 61) are both GRANTED.
3. Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. 1) and his amended complaint (Doc. 45) are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE against all remaining defendants. Leave
to amend the claims will be denied as futile.
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this file.

/s/ William W. Caldwell
William W. Caldwell
United States District Judge