Ferris et al v. Milton S. Hershey Medical Center et al
Filing
122
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) 1. Defendant Angelica Lopez-Heagys Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 100) is GRANTED in its entirety. 2. Defendants Ian M. Paul and Caitlin J. Malliss Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 103) is GRANTED in its entirety. 3. The Clerk of the Court SHALL CLOSE the file on this case (eo)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SCOTT FERRIS, JODI FERRIS, and
A.F., a minor, by her parents,
:
:
:
Plaintiffs,
:
:
v.
:
:
MILTON S. HERSHEY MEDICAL
:
CENTER; CAITLIN J. MALLIS, M.D.,
:
IAN M. PAUL, M.D., and JOHN DOE,
:
M.D., physicians; JANE DOE, R.N.,
:
JANET DOE, R.N., registered nurses;
:
JOHN ROE and JANE ROE, hospital staff :
members; JANET ROE and JACK ROE,
:
risk management personnel, personally and :
in his official capacity; OFFICER RIAN
:
BELL and OFFICER JAKE ROE, Derry
:
Township police officers, and ANGELICA :
LOPEZ-HEAGY, social worker, personally :
and in her official capacities; and
:
DAUPHIN COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES :
FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH,
:
:
Defendants.
:
No. 1:12-cv-0442
Hon. John E. Jones III
ORDER
September 29, 2016
Presently before this Court are a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by
Defendant Angelica Lopez-Heagy (doc. 100) and a Motion for Summary Judgment
filed by Ian M. Paul, M.D. and Caitlin J. Mallis, M.D. (Doc. 103). In conformity
with the Memorandum issued on today’s date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
THAT:
1.
Defendant Angelica Lopez-Heagy’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(doc. 100) is GRANTED in its entirety.
2.
Defendants Ian M. Paul and Caitlin J. Mallis’s Motion for Summary
Judgment (doc. 103) is GRANTED in its entirety.
3.
The Clerk of the Court SHALL CLOSE the file on this case
s/ John E. Jones III
John E. Jones III
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?