Johnson v. Federal Express Corporation

Filing 111

ORDER (Memorandum 110 filed previously as separate docket entry) - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Deft's MIL 63 is GRANTED in part & DENIED in part (see Paras 1a-c for specifics).; 2. Pltf's MIL 65 is GRANTED. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 2/28/14. (ki)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CATHALENE JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL EXPRESS
CORPORATION,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-444
(Chief Judge Conner)

ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2014, upon consideration of the twelve
motions in limine (Doc. 63) filed by defendant Federal Express Corporation, and the
motion in limine (Doc. 65) filed by plaintiff Cathalene Johnson, and for the reasons
set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.

Defendant’s motion in limine (Doc. 63) is GRANTED in part and
DENIED in part as follows:
a.
b.

The motion is DENIED with prejudice with respect to no. 1; and

c.

2.

The motion is GRANTED with respect to nos. 2, 5, 11, and 12;

The motion is DENIED without prejudice with respect to nos. 3,
4, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10.

Plaintiff’s motion in limine (Doc. 65) is GRANTED.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania