Curran v. M& T Bank Corporation et al

Filing 29

ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court ADOPTS the R&R of MJ Schwab. 1)Plaintiff Currans amended complaint (Doc. No. 3) is DISMISSED with prejudice;2) Defendant M&Ts motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED; 3) Defendant the Law Firms, Gates, and Shafiks motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 17) is GRANTED; 4) Defendant the Law Firms Gates, and Shafiks motion for sanctions (Doc. No. 20) is DENIED; and 5) Plaintiff Currans motion to strike (or alternatively construed as his sur-reply) (Doc. No. 27) is STRICKEN from the record. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Clerk of Court shall close the case. 17 28 13 3 20 Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 1/13/14. (sc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN F. CURRAN, III Plaintiff v. M&T BANK CORPORATION, et al. Defendants : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-cv-749 (Judge Kane) (Magistrate Judge Schwab) ORDER Before the court in the captioned action is a December 3, 2013 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. No timely objections have been filed. Accordingly, this 13th day of January 2014, upon review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Schwab. 1) Plaintiff Curran’s amended complaint (Doc. No. 3) is DISMISSED with prejudice; 2) Defendant M&T’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED; 3) Defendant the Law Firm’s, Gates’, and Shafik’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 17) is GRANTED; 4) Defendant the Law Firm’s Gates’, and Shafik’s motion for sanctions (Doc. No. 20) is DENIED; and 5) Plaintiff Curran’s motion to strike (or alternatively construed as his sur-reply) (Doc. No. 27) is STRICKEN from the record. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Clerk of Court shall close the case. s/ Yvette Kane YVETTE KANE, District Judge United States t Districtn Courta n i a M i d d l e D is tric o f P e n s ylv

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?