Jamison v. Varano et al

Filing 50

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 2013, upon consideration of the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge 40 , filed February 6, 2013, to which no objections were filed, and upon independent revie w of the record, it is ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judges report 40 is adopted. 2. Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary and permanent injunction 21 is DENIED. 3. Plaintiffs motion to withdraw his motion for a preliminary and permanent injunction 48 is DENIED as MOOT. 4. The above-captioned case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings, including a Report and Recommendation on dispositive motions, if necessary. Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 4/22/13. (am)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DASHAUN JAMISON, Plaintiff v. DAVID VARANO, et al., Defendants : : : : CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-1500 : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 2013, upon consideration of the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 40), filed February 6, 2013, to which no objections were filed, and upon independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judge’s report (Doc. 40) is adopted. 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary and permanent injunction (Doc. 21) is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw his motion for a preliminary and permanent injunction (Doc. 48) is DENIED as MOOT. 4. The above-captioned case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings, including a Report and Recommendation on dispositive motions, if necessary. /s/ William W. Caldwell William W. Caldwell United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?