Quelet v. Preston et al
Filing
126
ORDER (Memorandum 125 filed previously as separate docket entry) - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defts' MTDs 100 , 102 , 104 , 106 , 110 & 112 are GRANTED.; 2. Action DISMISSED with prejudice & without costs.; 3. Clrk of Ct directed to CLOSE this case. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 1/16/14. (ki)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JEFFREY J. QUELET,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
LISA SMITH, CRNP; VERNON H.
:
PRESTON, M.D.; STEPHEN
:
PFISTERER, MPT; HANOVER
:
FAMILY PRACTICE ASSOCIATES,
:
LTD; DEBRA DEANGELO, D.O.;
:
HILLSIDE PAIN MANAGEMENT, PC/ :
YORK ADAMS PAIN SPECIALISTS, :
PC; BRENDAN K. BUCKLEY, D.C.
:
t/d/b/a BUCKLEY CHIROPRACTIC
:
CENTER; and HANOVER
:
REHABILITATION CENTER d/b/a
:
YORK STREET REHAB a/k/a
:
HANOVER HOSPITAL
:
:
Defendants.
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-01914
(Chief Judge Conner)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of January, 2014, upon consideration of the motions
to dismiss, filed by the following defendants: (1) Deborah DeAngelo, D.O. and
Hillside Pain Management, PC/York Adams Pain Specialist, P.C. (Doc. 100), (2)
Brendan K. Buckley, D.C. t/d/b/a Buckley Chiropractic Center, P.C. (Doc. 102), (3)
Hanover Rehabilitation Center d/b/a York Street Rehab a/k/a Hanover Hospital,
Inc. (Doc. 104), (4) Vernon Preston, M.D. and Hanover Family Practice Associates,
LTD (Doc. 106), (5) Lisa Smith, C.R.N.P. (Doc. 110), and (6) Stephen Pfisterer, MPT
(Doc. 112) (collectively, the “Defendants”), and for the reasons set forth in the
accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
Defendants’ motions to dismiss (Docs. 100, 102, 104, 106, 110, 112) are
GRANTED.
2.
The above-captioned action is DISMISSED with prejudice and
without costs.
3.
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?