Quelet v. Preston et al

Filing 126

ORDER (Memorandum 125 filed previously as separate docket entry) - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defts' MTDs 100 , 102 , 104 , 106 , 110 & 112 are GRANTED.; 2. Action DISMISSED with prejudice & without costs.; 3. Clrk of Ct directed to CLOSE this case. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 1/16/14. (ki)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JEFFREY J. QUELET, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : LISA SMITH, CRNP; VERNON H. : PRESTON, M.D.; STEPHEN : PFISTERER, MPT; HANOVER : FAMILY PRACTICE ASSOCIATES, : LTD; DEBRA DEANGELO, D.O.; : HILLSIDE PAIN MANAGEMENT, PC/ : YORK ADAMS PAIN SPECIALISTS, : PC; BRENDAN K. BUCKLEY, D.C. : t/d/b/a BUCKLEY CHIROPRACTIC : CENTER; and HANOVER : REHABILITATION CENTER d/b/a : YORK STREET REHAB a/k/a : HANOVER HOSPITAL : : Defendants. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-01914 (Chief Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 16th day of January, 2014, upon consideration of the motions to dismiss, filed by the following defendants: (1) Deborah DeAngelo, D.O. and Hillside Pain Management, PC/York Adams Pain Specialist, P.C. (Doc. 100), (2) Brendan K. Buckley, D.C. t/d/b/a Buckley Chiropractic Center, P.C. (Doc. 102), (3) Hanover Rehabilitation Center d/b/a York Street Rehab a/k/a Hanover Hospital, Inc. (Doc. 104), (4) Vernon Preston, M.D. and Hanover Family Practice Associates, LTD (Doc. 106), (5) Lisa Smith, C.R.N.P. (Doc. 110), and (6) Stephen Pfisterer, MPT (Doc. 112) (collectively, the “Defendants”), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ motions to dismiss (Docs. 100, 102, 104, 106, 110, 112) are GRANTED. 2. The above-captioned action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. /S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?