Broadwater v. Fow et al
ORDER denying defendants' motion 63 to strike plaintiff's amended complaint. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 1/10/14. (ki)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHRISTOPHER G. BROADWATER
CHRISTIAN D. FOW, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-1937
(Chief Judge Conner)
AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2014, upon consideration of the motion
(Doc. 63) to strike plaintiff’s amended complaint (Doc. 58) filed by defendants
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State Police, Nathan Swink, Ralph
Hockenberry, and David Rush, wherein defendants aver that plaintiff’s amended
complaint did not comport with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), which
allows for the amendment of pleadings only with the opposing party’s written
consent or the court’s leave, and for the reasons expressed by the court in the
telephone conference held with the parties on January 10, 2014, specifically that
leave to amend in the manner undertaken by plaintiff’s counsel was in fact granted,
it is hereby ordered that defendants’ motion (Doc. 63) to strike is DENIED.
/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?