Rodriguez v. Thomas et al
Filing
268
ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 267 ; 1) The mtn for summary judgment 234 is GRANTED with respect to Dfts Thomas, Crawley, McClintock, and Fosnot.2) Entry of judgment on their behalf is DEFERRED pending further order of court.3) The mtns for summary judgment 216 , 223 , 228 ) are DENIED with respect to Dft Potter on the issues of excessive force and retaliation while at SHU, and with respect to Defendants Eichner and Knapp on the issue of failure tointervene/protect.4) The court will issue a separate scheduling order. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 3/6/18. (ma)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WALTER RODRIGUEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
WARDEN J.E. THOMAS, et al.,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civil No. 1:12-CV-02090
(Judge Sylvia H. Rambo)
ORDER
In accordance with the memorandum of law issued on this date, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1) The motion for summary judgment (Doc. 234) is GRANTED
with respect to Defendants Thomas, Crawley, McClintock, and
Fosnot.
2) Entry of judgment on their behalf is DEFERRED pending
further order of court.
3) The motions for summary judgment (Docs. 216, 223, 228) are
DENIED with respect to Defendant Potter on the issues of
excessive force and retaliation while at SHU, and with respect
to Defendants Eichner and Knapp on the issue of failure to
intervene/protect.
4) The court will issue a separate scheduling order.
s/Sylvia H. Rambo
SYLVIA H. RAMBO
United States District Judge
Dated: March 6, 2018
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?