Rodriguez v. Thomas et al

Filing 268

ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 267 ; 1) The mtn for summary judgment 234 is GRANTED with respect to Dfts Thomas, Crawley, McClintock, and Fosnot.2) Entry of judgment on their behalf is DEFERRED pending further order of court.3) The mtns for summary judgment 216 , 223 , 228 ) are DENIED with respect to Dft Potter on the issues of excessive force and retaliation while at SHU, and with respect to Defendants Eichner and Knapp on the issue of failure tointervene/protect.4) The court will issue a separate scheduling order. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 3/6/18. (ma)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WALTER RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN J.E. THOMAS, et al., Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : Civil No. 1:12-CV-02090 (Judge Sylvia H. Rambo) ORDER In accordance with the memorandum of law issued on this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1) The motion for summary judgment (Doc. 234) is GRANTED with respect to Defendants Thomas, Crawley, McClintock, and Fosnot. 2) Entry of judgment on their behalf is DEFERRED pending further order of court. 3) The motions for summary judgment (Docs. 216, 223, 228) are DENIED with respect to Defendant Potter on the issues of excessive force and retaliation while at SHU, and with respect to Defendants Eichner and Knapp on the issue of failure to intervene/protect. 4) The court will issue a separate scheduling order. s/Sylvia H. Rambo SYLVIA H. RAMBO United States District Judge Dated: March 6, 2018

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?