Mobley v. Snyder et al

Filing 95

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 93 of MJ Schwab. i) Dfts partial motion to dismiss 34 is granted.ii) Pltfs claims against Dfts in their official capacities are dismissed with prejudice.iii) Pltfs failure-to-train and failure-to-supervise claim against Dft Bickell is dismissed with prejudice.iv) Pltfs claims for injunctive relief are dismissed as moot.v) This case is remanded to the MJ Schwab for further proceedings.Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 07/08/14. (ma)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GERRY MOBLEY, JR., Plaintiff v. C.O. SNYDER, et al., Defendants : : : : CIVIL NO. 1:13-CV-772 : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2014, upon consideration of the thorough and detailed Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab (Doc. 93), to which no objections have been filed, and upon an independent review of the record, it is Ordered that said Report is approved and accepted. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is further Ordered that: i) Defendants’ partial motion to dismiss (Doc. 34) is granted. ii) Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants in their official capacities are dismissed with prejudice. iii) Plaintiff’s failure-to-train and failure-to-supervise claim against Defendant Bickell is dismissed with prejudice. iv) Plaintiff’s claims for injunctive relief are dismissed as moot. v) This case is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. /s/ William W. Caldwell William W. Caldwell United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?