Styer v. Frito-Lay, Inc.

Filing 27

ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson.2) The Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Doc. No.16) is DENIED.3) The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Carlson for pretrial management and for resolution of any pending motions or any future pending motions related to pretrial management. 25 16 Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 12/5/13. (sc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FRANKLIN STYER Plaintiff v. FRITO-LAY, INC. Defendant : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-833 (Judge Kane) (Magistrate Judge Carlson) ORDER Before the Court in the above-captioned action is a November 15, 2013 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. No timely objections have been filed. AND NOW, on this 5th day of December 2013, upon review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson. 2) The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 16) is DENIED. 3) The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Carlson for pretrial management and for resolution of any pending motions or any future pending motions related to pretrial management. S/ Yvette Kane YVETTE KANE, District Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?