Styer v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
Filing
27
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson.2) The Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Doc. No.16) is DENIED.3) The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Carlson for pretrial management and for resolution of any pending motions or any future pending motions related to pretrial management. 25 16 Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 12/5/13. (sc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
FRANKLIN STYER
Plaintiff
v.
FRITO-LAY, INC.
Defendant
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-833
(Judge Kane)
(Magistrate Judge Carlson)
ORDER
Before the Court in the above-captioned action is a November 15, 2013 Report
and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. No timely objections have been filed.
AND NOW, on this 5th day of December 2013, upon review of the record and the
applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge
Carlson.
2) The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. No.
16) is DENIED.
3) The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Carlson for pretrial
management and for resolution of any pending motions or any future pending motions
related to pretrial management.
S/ Yvette Kane
YVETTE KANE, District Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?