Manning v. Herman et al

Filing 35

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - AND NOW, this 10th day of March, 2014, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum filed concurrently with this Order, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs Motions to Stay (Doc . 25, Doc. 28, Doc. 32 and Doc. 33) are DENIED. 2. Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration to Appoint Standby Counsel (Doc. 28) is DENIED. 3. Plaintiffs Motion for 15 Federal Subpoenas (Doc. 26) is DENIED without prejudice. 4. Plaintiffs Motion to R emove Specific Defendants from This Action and Add Them To Manning v. Ross, 1:13-CV-0831 (Doc. 26) is DENIED. 5. Plaintiff shall be granted an additional sixty (60) days, or until Friday, May 9, 2014 to file an Amended Complaint in this matter. As p reviously indicated, Plaintiff is not required to re-attach and refile the exhibits to the original complaint when filing his amended complaint. Plaintiff is directed to reference the exhibits by document and page number as they are docketed with the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick on 3/10/2014. (cw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EUGENE DOUGLAS MANNING, Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-01426 v. (JONES, J.) (MEHALCHICK, M.J.) DOUGLAS HERMAN, et al., Defendants ORDER AND NOW, this 10th day of March, 2014, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum filed concurrently with this Order, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s Motions to Stay (Doc. 25, Doc. 28, Doc. 32 and Doc. 33) are DENIED. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration to Appoint Standby Counsel (Doc. 28) is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff’s Motion for 15 Federal Subpoenas (Doc. 26) is DENIED without prejudice. 4. Plaintiff’s Motion to Remove Specific Defendants from This Action and Add Them To Manning v. Ross, 1:13-CV-0831 (Doc. 26) is DENIED. 5. Plaintiff shall be granted an additional sixty (60) days, or until Friday, May 9, 2014 to file an Amended Complaint in this matter. As previously indicated, Plaintiff is not required to re-attach and refile the exhibits to the original complaint when filing his amended complaint. Plaintiff is directed to reference the exhibits by document and page number as they are docketed with the Court. BY THE COURT: s/ Karoline Mehalchick KAROLINE MEHALCHICK United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?