Booze v. Wetzel et al

Filing 17

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED; 2. Magistrate Judge Schwabs Report of Recommendation (Doc. No. 10) isADOPTED; 3. Plaintiffs m otion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is GRANTED; 4. Plaintiffs objections (Doc. No. 12) are OVERRULED;5. The Court will construe Plaintiffs filing of January 30, 2014 (Doc. No. 14) as his amended complaint; 6. All further proceedings in this matter are referred to Magistrate Judge Schwab. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on April 17, 2014. (sc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSHUA BOOZE, Plaintiff v. JOHN E. WETZEL, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : No. 1:13-cv-02139 (Judge Kane) (Magistrate Judge Schwab) AND NOW, on this 17th day of April 2014, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED; 2. Magistrate Judge Schwab’s Report of Recommendation (Doc. No. 10) is ADOPTED; 3. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is GRANTED; 4. Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. No. 12) are OVERRULED; 5. The Court will construe Plaintiff’s filing of January 30, 2014 (Doc. No. 14) as his amended complaint; 6. All further proceedings in this matter are referred to Magistrate Judge Schwab. s/ Yvette Kane Yvette Kane, District Judge U.S. District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?