Transcontinental Refrigerated Lines Inc v. New Prime Inc et al
Filing
121
ORDER (Memorandum 120 filed previously as separate docket entry) GRANTING Transcontinental's motion 61 in its entirety, noting ct will return the docs to producing party upon expiration of the appeal period - in event of appeal ct will retain possession of docs pending disposition of appeal, & noting revised scheduling order shall issue. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 6/3/14. (ki)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TRANSCONTINENTAL
REFRIGERATED LINES, INC., by
LAWRENCE V. YOUNG, ESQ.,
liquidating agent,
Plaintiff,
v.
NEW PRIME, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL NO. 1:13-CV-2163
(Chief Judge Conner)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of June, 2014, upon consideration of the amended
motion (Doc. 61) filed by plaintiff debtor Transcontinental Refrigerated Lines, Inc.,
(“Transcontinental”), by and through its liquidating agent, Lawrence Young, Esq.,
to overrule the objections of Handler Thayer & Duggan (“HTD”) to production of
certain documents based on the attorney-client privilege, and for the reasons set
forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
Transcontinental’s motion (Doc. 61) is GRANTED in its entirety.
2.
The court will return the documents to the producing party upon
expiration of the appeal period. In the event of an appeal, the court
will retain possession of the documents pending disposition of the
appeal.
3.
A revised scheduling order shall issue.
/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?