Conservit, Inc. v. Deimler's Recycling, Inc. et al

Filing 20

ORDER (Memorandum 19 filed previously as separate docket entry) : It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defts' MTD 6 is GRANTED to extent is seeks dismissal of Ct III of complaint & DENIED in all other respects.; 2. Ct III of complaint 1 DISMISSED w/out prejudice & Conservit granted leave to amend Ct III to cure deficiencies id'd in accompanying memo w/in 14 days of date of this order w/ failure to file w/in that time to result in Ct III being dismissed w/ prejudice. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 9/23/14. (ki)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVIT, INC., Plaintiff v. DEIMLER’S RECYCLING, INC., and GREG A. DEIMLER, Defendants : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-0296 (Chief Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of September, 2014, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 6) of defendants Deimler’s Recycling, Inc., (“Deimler’s Recycling”), and Greg A. Deimler (collectively “defendants”), to dismiss the complaint (Doc. 1) of plaintiff Conservit, Inc., (“Conservit”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ motion (Doc. 6) is GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal of Count III of Conservit’s complaint. The motion (Doc. 6) is DENIED in all other respects. 2. Count III of Conservit’s complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. Conservit is GRANTED leave to amend Count III of its complaint to cure the deficiencies identified in the accompanying memorandum within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. If Conservit fails to file an amended pleading within that time, Count III shall be dismissed with prejudice. /S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?