Williams v. Colvin

Filing 18

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry).IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Denise K. Williams and against the Commissioner as set forth in the following paragraph. 2) The decision of th e Commissioner of Social Security denying Denise K. Williams disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income is vacated and the case remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security to: 2.1) Conduct a new administrative hearing, appropriately evaluate the medical evidence, and appropriately access Plaintiff's limitations. 3) The Clerk of Court shall close this case.Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 3/31/15. (aaa)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DENISE K. WILLIAMS CASE NO. 1:14-cv-000557-GBC Plaintiff, (MAGISTRATE JUDGE COHN) v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPEAL, VACATING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER, AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS Defendant. Docs. 1, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 In accordance with the accompanying memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Denise K. Williams and against the Commissioner as set forth in the following paragraph. 2. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Denise K. Williams disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income is vacated and the case remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security to: 2.1 Conduct a new administrative hearing, appropriately evaluate the medical evidence, and appropriately assess Plaintiff’s limitations. 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. Dated: March 31, 2015 s/Gerald B. Cohn GERALD B. COHN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?