Jaryee v. The District Director for Immigration Custom Enforcement et al
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 filed by Jerome Jaryee (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 05/20/14. (ma)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JEROME JARYEE,
Petitioner
v.
THE DISTRICT DIRECTOR FOR
IMMIGRATION CUSTOM
ENFORCEMENT, ET AL.,
Respondents
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL NO. 1:CV-14-0676
(Judge Caldwell)
MEMORANDUM
I.
Introduction
On April 6, 2014, pro se petitioner, Jerome Jaryee, a detainee of the Bureau
of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Under Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 121 S.Ct. 2491,
150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001), Jaryee challenges his continued detention by ICE pending his
removal from the United States. As relief, Jaryee seeks to be released on bond pending
his removal. (Doc. 1, Pet.)(Doc. 1, Pet.)
Because it appears from a review of the Petition, and Respondent’s response
that Jaryee is not entitled to relief at this time, the petition will be denied, but without
prejudice to filing another one if circumstances change and Petitioner can show that he is
entitled to relief under Zadvydas.
II.
Background
Jaryee is a native and citizen of Liberia, currently being detained at the York
County Prison, in York Pennsylvania. (Doc. 1, Pet.) He entered the United States on June
7, 2004, as a lawful permanent resident. (Doc. 7-1, Resp. Ex. 6., ECF p. 46).
In 2012, Jaryee was convicted of three separate drug offenses. (Id.) On
October 24, 2012, ICE officials served Jaryee with a Notice to Appear charging him as
removable from the United States pursuant to Sections 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act (INA) for a conviction of an aggravated felony involving a drugtrafficking offense; and pursuant to § 237(a)(2)(B)(I) for a conviction relating to a controlled
substance other than a single offense involving possession for one’s own use of thirty
grams or less of marijuana. (Id., Ex. 2, ECF pp. 5-7).
On May 31, 2013, an immigration judge ordered Jaryee removed from the
United States. (Id., Ex. 4, ECF p. 42). In the same order, the immigration judge denied
Jaryee’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and deferral of removal. (Id.) On
October 18, 2013, the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed Jaryee’s appeal. (Id., Ex.
5, ECF pp. 43 - 45. On October 18, 2013, Jaryee’s order of removal became final. (Id., Ex.
6, ECF p. 47).
Jaryee entered ICE custody on December 24, 2013. (Id.) On March 21,
2014, at the conclusion of ninety days’ detention, ICE officials issued a decision to continue
Jaryee’s detention on the basis that his criminal history demonstrates he is a danger to the
community. ICE officials also noted that “it appears likely that a travel document will be
issued in the near future.” (Id., ECF p. 47). Jaryee was also advised that “[i]f you have not
been released or removed from the United States by June 22, 2014, jurisdiction of the
custody decision in [his] case will be transferred to the Headquarters Post Order Custody
Review Unit” in Washington, D.C. (Id.)
-2-
III.
Discussion
The detention, release, and removal of aliens subject to a final order of
removal is governed by the provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1231. Pursuant to § 1231(a), the
Attorney General has ninety days to remove an alien from the United States after his order
of removal becomes administratively final. See also Rodney v. Mukasey, 340 F. App’x.
761, 764 (3d Cir. 2009). During this ninety-day period, which is referred to in immigration
terms as “the removal period,” detention of the alien is mandatory. See 8 U.S.C. §
1231(a)(2). At the conclusion of the ninety-day period, if the alien has not been removed
and still remains in the United States, his post-removal-period detention may be continued
only as long as “reasonably necessary” to effectuate his removal from the United States.
Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at 689, 121 S.Ct. 2498. Alternatively, he may be released under the
supervision of the Attorney General. See 8 U.S.C. §§1231(a)(3) and (6).
The Supreme Court in Zadvydas, supra, held that the presumptively
reasonable post-removal-detention period of an alien pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(6) is
six months. Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at 701, 121. S.Ct. at 2505. Detention past this period
“does not mean that every alien not removed must be released.” Id. If at the conclusion of
the six-month period the alien provides good reason to believe that there is no significant
likelihood of deportation in the reasonably foreseeable future, the burden shifts to the
government to “respond with evidence sufficient to rebut that showing.” (Id.)
Here, Jaryee’s order of removal became final on October 18, 2013. Jaryee
first entered ICE custody on December 24, 2013. His habeas petition was mailed April 6,
2014. Accordingly, his post-removal-detention period is “presumptively reasonable”
-3-
because he has not yet been held by ICE for longer than six months. See Zadvydas, 533
U.S. at 701, 121 S.Ct. at 2505; Akinwale v. Ashcroft, 287 F.3d 1050, 1052 (11th Cir.
2002)(“this six-month period thus must have expired at the time [petitioner’s] § 2241
petition was filed in order to state a claim under Zadvydas.”). The six-month mark will
arrive on or about June 25, 2014. A petition filed before the expiration date of the
presumptively reasonable six months of detention is properly dismissed as premature. Id.
As the petition is premature, there is no need for the court to examine whether Petitioner
has established “that there is no significant likelihood of [his] removal in the reasonably
foreseeable future." Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at 701, 121. S.Ct. at 2505.
For the reasons set forth above, Petitioner’s § 2241 petition will be denied,
but without prejudice to filing another one if circumstances change and Petitioner can show
that he is entitled to relief under Zadvydas.
An appropriate order follows.
/s/ William W. Caldwell
William W. Caldwell
United States District Judge
Date: May 20, 2014
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?