Nye v. Cumberland County et al
Filing
31
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) 1. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 24) is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is granted in favor of Defendants Williams, Krupko and Cumberland County with respect to Plaintiffs federal claim s. 3. This matter is DISMISSED as against Defendant Kramer. 4. Plaintiff shall show cause within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order why Defendant John Doe should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed.R. Civ. P. 4(m). 5. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 67; 1367(c)(3), the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs remaining state law claims and these claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff re-filingthem in state court. 6. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE the file on this case. (eo)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JUSTIN RICHARD NYE,
Plaintiff,
v.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
1:14-cv-713
Hon. John E. Jones III
ORDER
February 19, 2016
In conformity with the Memorandum issued on today’s date, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 24) is GRANTED.
2. Judgment is granted in favor of Defendants Williams, Krupko and
Cumberland County with respect to Plaintiff’s federal claims.
3. This matter is DISMISSED as against Defendant Kramer.
4. Plaintiff shall show cause within fourteen (14) days of the date of this
Order why Defendant John Doe should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 4(m).
5. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3), the Court declines to exercise
supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s remaining state law claims and
these claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff re-filing
them in state court.
6. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE the file on this case.
s/ John E. Jones III
John E. Jones III
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?