Kegerise v. Susquehanna Township School District et al

Filing 241

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendants motion in limine (Doc. No. 209), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. See order for further details. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 4/5/2019. (ve)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SUSAN M. KEGERISE, Plaintiff v. SUSQUEHANNA TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : No. 1:14-cv-0747 (Judge Kane) ORDER AND NOW, on this 5th day of April 2019, consistent with the Memorandum entered concurrently with this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendants’ motion in limine (Doc. No. 209), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Defendants’ motion is GRANTED as to: (1) testimony from Dr. Chorney and (2) testimony from Plaintiff regarding her retirement benefits; 2. Defendants’ motion is DENIED as to: (1) testimony of Earl Crum, Dr. John Sygielski, Gae Bradley, and Karen Kesler; (2) evidence and testimony pertaining to the subsequent hiring of Oslwen Anderson as a business manager for purposes of Plaintiff’s sex discrimination claim; (3) and evidence and testimony contradictory to the opinion issued by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Plaintiff’s mandamus action; and 3. Defendants’ motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Defendants’ ability to raise a challenge to the admissibility of the following evidence at trial: (1) testimony by attorney witnesses; (2) evidence and testimony as to claims previously dismissed by the Court; (3) and testimony from Peter Sakol and Kathy DelGrande. s/ Yvette Kane Yvette Kane, District Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?