Sepulveda et al v. Ebbert et al
Filing
75
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) 1. The remaining Defendants motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 65), is GRANTED as set forth below. 2. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the the Defendants Ficken, Rosencrance, Rosler and Burgh and against Plaintiffs. 3. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. 4. Any appeal taken from this order will be deemedfrivolous, without probable cause, and not taken in good faith. (eo)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GEORGE SEPULVEDA, et al.,
Plaintiffs
vs.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
WARDEN DAVID EBBERT, et al.,
Defendants
No. 1:14-cv-00789
(Judge Kane)
ORDER
In accordance with the accompanying memorandum, on this
7th day of February 2017, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1.
The remaining Defendants’ motion for summary
judgment (Doc. No. 65), is GRANTED as set forth below.
2.
Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the
the Defendants Ficken, Rosencrance, Rosler and Burgh and against
Plaintiffs.
3.
The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.
4.
Any appeal taken from this order will be deemed
frivolous, without probable cause, and not taken in good faith.
s/ Yvette Kane
Yvette Kane, District Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?