Sepulveda et al v. Ebbert et al

Filing 75

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) 1. The remaining Defendants motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 65), is GRANTED as set forth below. 2. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the the Defendants Ficken, Rosencrance, Rosler and Burgh and against Plaintiffs. 3. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. 4. Any appeal taken from this order will be deemedfrivolous, without probable cause, and not taken in good faith. (eo)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GEORGE SEPULVEDA, et al.,
Plaintiffs
vs.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

WARDEN DAVID EBBERT, et al.,
Defendants

No. 1:14-cv-00789
(Judge Kane)

ORDER
In accordance with the accompanying memorandum, on this
7th day of February 2017, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1.

The remaining Defendants’ motion for summary

judgment (Doc. No. 65), is GRANTED as set forth below.
2.

Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the

the Defendants Ficken, Rosencrance, Rosler and Burgh and against
Plaintiffs.
3.

The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.

4.

Any appeal taken from this order will be deemed

frivolous, without probable cause, and not taken in good faith.

s/ Yvette Kane
Yvette Kane, District Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania