Little et al v. Mottern et al

Filing 145

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Littles document purporting to be a set of interrogatories (Doc. 132) is stricken from the record. The Clerk of Court shall delete the filing (Doc. 132) from the docket. 120 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Little shall file a brief in opposition to that pending motion to dismiss (Doc. 120) the third amended complaint (Doc. 35) on or before December 4, 2015.Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 11/24/15. (sc)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHAEL L. LITTLE, et al.,

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Plaintiffs
vs.
B. MOTTERN, et al.,
Defendants

No. 1:14-CV-00953
(Judge Kane)

ORDER
In accordance with the accompanying memorandum, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED THAT Little’s document purporting to be a set of
interrogatories (Doc. 132) is stricken from the record. The Clerk
of Court shall delete the filing (Doc. 132) from the docket.

This

order is entered without prejudice to Little’s right to file a
motion to compel discovery which fully complies with the Local
Rules of Court. However, because there is a pending motion to
dismiss filed by Defendants raising, inter alia, an issue of
failure to exhaust administrative remedies, discovery will be
stayed until the court rules on that motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
THAT Little shall file a brief in opposition to that pending
motion to dismiss (Doc. 120) the third amended complaint (Doc. 35)
on or before December 4, 2015.

Failure to file an opposition

brief shall result in Little’s third amended complaint being

dismissed for failure to prosecute and abide by a court order.
Stackhouse v. Mazurkiewicz, 951 F.2d 29, 30 (3d Cir. 1991).

S/ Yvette Kane
Yvette Kane
United States District Judge
Date: November 24, 2015

2