Travillion v. Wetzel et al
Filing
81
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)1. Defendants motion (Doc. 58) for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall ENTER judgment in favor of all remaining Defendants, namely Clark, Sutton, Kearns, Hardy, Burton, She rman, Crawford, Stover, Duncan, Rutherford, Gates, Druckemiller, Perks and Weaver, and against Plaintiff. 2. The Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the pending state law claims.3. The Clerk of Court is further directed to CLOSE this case. 4. Any appeal from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). (eo)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JAMAR L. TRAVILLION,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN E. WETZEL, et al.,
Defendants
:
:
1:14-cv-1159
:
:
Hon. John E. Jones III
:
:
:
ORDER
September 25, 2017
NOW THEREFORE, upon consideration of Defendants’ motion (Doc. 58)
for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, and in
accordance with the Court’s Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
1.
Defendants’ motion (Doc. 58) for summary judgment is GRANTED.
The Clerk of Court shall ENTER judgment in favor of all remaining
Defendants, namely Clark, Sutton, Kearns, Hardy, Burton, Sherman,
Crawford, Stover, Duncan, Rutherford, Gates, Druckemiller, Perks
and Weaver, and against Plaintiff.
2.
The Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the
pending state law claims.
3.
The Clerk of Court is further directed to CLOSE this case.
4.
Any appeal from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
s/ John E. Jones III
John E. Jones III
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?