Hampton v. Wetzel

Filing 48

ORDER denying motion 38 for waiver to directly serve defts via ECF & directing pltf to serve all docs acc to FRCP & MDPA Local Rules. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 1/4/16. (ki)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHAWN HAMPTON, Plaintiff v. JOHN WETZEL, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL NO. 1:14-CV-1367 (Chief Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2016, upon consideration of plaintiff‟s motion (Doc. 38) to waive direct service of court filings, wherein he seeks permission to serve one paper copy of all of his filings only upon the court for filing in the CM/ECF system, and upon consideration of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b) providing that a party may use the court‟s electronic filing system to serve the opposing party only when: (1) the opposing attorney consented to service by electronic means, and (2) electronic service is authorized by local rule, see FED. R. CIV. P. 5(b)(1), (b)(2)(E), (b)(3), and upon further consideration of Local Rule 5.7 providing that only registered Filing Users may serve documents via ECF, see L.R. 5.7, and that a “„Filing User‟ is an individual who has a court-issued login and password to file documents electronically”, see Standing Order regarding Electronic Case Filing Policies and Procedures, § 1.2, and that plaintiff is not an individual with a court-issued login and password, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The motion (Doc. 38) for a waiver to directly serve Defendants via ECF is DENIED. 2. Plaintiff shall serve any and all documents according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Middle District of Pennsylvania Local Rules of Court. /S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?