McIntyre v. Kellinger

Filing 49

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) 1. The motion (Doc. 31) for summary judgment is GRANTED. TheClerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of DefendantKensinger and against Plaintiff on Counts I and IV of the compl aint.2. Counts II and III against Kensinger and unknown prison officials isDISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).3. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over thePlaintiffs state law claims found at Counts V-VIII. 28 U.S.C. §1367(c)(3).4. Plaintiffs motion (Doc. 44) to amend is DENIED.5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.6. Any appeal from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith.See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). (eo)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JEROME MCINTYRE, Plaintiff, v. LT. KELLINGER, Defendant. : : : : : : : 1:14-cv-1425 Hon. John E. Jones III ORDER February 24, 2017 NOW THEREFORE, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 31) for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, and in accordance with the Court’s Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The motion (Doc. 31) for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of Defendant Kensinger and against Plaintiff on Counts I and IV of the complaint. 2. Counts II and III against Kensinger and “unknown prison officials” is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 3. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Plaintiff’s state law claims found at Counts V-VIII. 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). 4. Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 44) to amend is DENIED. 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 6. Any appeal from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). s/ John E. Jones III John E. Jones III United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?