Marin v. Schmider

Filing 58

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. MJ Schwabs R&R (Doc. No. 47) is ADOPTED; 2. Pltfs objections (Doc. No. 54) are OVERRULED; 3. Defts objections (Doc. Nos. 49, 50) are OVERRULED; 4. Defts motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED IN PARTAND DENIED IN PART. This case is referred back to MJ Schwab for further pre-trial mgmt. 29 50 49 47 15 54 Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 9/30/15. (sc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEL M. MARIN, Plaintiff : : : : : : : v. JOE SCHMIDER, Defendant No. 1:14-cv-01523 (Judge Kane) (Magistrate Judge Schwab) ORDER AND NOW, on this 30th day of September 2015, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Magistrate Judge Schwab’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 47) is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. No. 54) are OVERRULED; 3. Defendant’s objections (Doc. Nos. 49, 50) are OVERRULED; 4. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: a. b. c. d. Plaintiff’s procedural due process claim premised upon an asserted property interest in an EMT license is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Plaintiff’s “tortious interference with career” claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Plaintiff’s procedural due process claim based on a liberty interest is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and In all other respects, the motion is DENIED; 5. Plaintiff’s request (Doc. 29-1 at 10) to have Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 15) construed as one for summary judgment and denied as premature is DENIED; and 6. The above-captioned action is referred back to Magistrate Judge Schwab for further pre-trial management. S/ Yvette Kane Yvette Kane, District Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?