Muth v. Woodring et al

Filing 61

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry. IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants Shriver and Harrisburg's motion 27 to dismiss count 1 of Plaintiffs amended complaint is GRANTED, and count 1 is DISMISSED asto Defendant Shriver; 2 . Defendants Woodring and Dauphin Countys motion 55 for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED in its entirety, and counts 1 and 2 are DISMISSED as to Defendant Woodring, and count 3 is DISMISSED as toDefendant Dauphin County; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 8/17/17. (rw) Modified on 8/17/2017 (rw).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RONALD E. MUTH, Plaintiff v. DENNIS A. WOODRING, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : No. 1:14-cv-01798 (Judge Kane) ORDER AND NOW, this 17th day of August 2017, upon consideration of the Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit vacating this Court’s November 30, 2015 Order denying Defendant Shriver’s motion to dismiss count 1 of Plaintiff’s amended complaint (Doc. Nos. 53, 54, and 54-1), and Defendants Woodring and Dauphin County’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 55), as well as the briefs supporting that motion (Doc. Nos. 56, 59), and Plaintiff’s brief in opposition to the motion (Doc. No. 58), IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants Shriver and Harrisburg’s motion to dismiss count 1 of Plaintiff’s amended complaint (Doc. No. 27), is GRANTED, and count 1 is DISMISSED as to Defendant Shriver; 2. Defendants Woodring and Dauphin County’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 55), is GRANTED in its entirety, and counts 1 and 2 are DISMISSED as to Defendant Woodring, and count 3 is DISMISSED as to Defendant Dauphin County; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case. s/ Yvette Kane Yvette Kane, District Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?