Liddick v. Tritt et al

Filing 116

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2018, IT IS HERE BY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1) The report and recommendation of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. 2) Summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of Nancy Snyder, Vincent Suzadail, William Sierdzinski, and Joyce Montermurno on the claims of intentional retaliation. 3) Liddick motion seeking leave to respond to the first report and recommendation filed by the magistrate judge (Doc. 111) is DENIED. 4) The Fourteenth Ame ndment due process claim against Corrections Officer Charles Krah, Corrections Officer Brian Bresnock, and Hearing Examiner Sharon Luquis will proceed to trial. 5) A trial date will be set forth in a separate order.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 7/31/18. (dmn)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WAYNE LIDDICK,
Plaintiff,
v.
BRENDA TRITT, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Civil No. 1:14-cv-1813

Judge Sylvia H. Rambo

ORDER
AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2018, IT IS HERE BY ORDERED AS
FOLLOWS:
1) The report and recommendation of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED.
2) Summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of Nancy Snyder, Vincent
Suzadail, William Sierdzinski, and Joyce Montermurno on the claims of
intentional retaliation.
3) Liddick motion seeking leave to respond to the first report and
recommendation filed by the magistrate judge (Doc. 111) is DENIED.
4) The Fourteenth Amendment due process claim against Corrections Officer
Charles Krah, Corrections Officer Brian Bresnock, and Hearing Examiner
Sharon Luquis will proceed to trial.
5) A trial date will be set forth in a separate order.

s/Sylvia H. Rambo
SYLVIA H. RAMBO
United States District Judge