Wotring v. Stuski et al

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 16 Report and Recommendations, ORDER REMANDING CASE; granting in part and denying in part 4 Motion to Dismiss. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice with respect to all federal claims pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6). All remaing claims are remanded to the Court of Common Pleas for Cumberland County pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447 (c). (Certified copy to Cumberland County Prothonotary) Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 7/22/15. (pw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DOUGLAS WOTRING Plaintiff v. MARGARET STUSKI, et al. Defendants : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-cv-1843 (Judge Kane) (Magistrate Judge Mehalchick) ORDER Before the Court in the captioned action is a July 1, 2015 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. No timely objections have been filed. ACCORDINGLY, this 22nd day of July 2015, upon review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick (Doc. No. 16) and: 1) The motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 4) is GRANTED IN PART; 2) The complaint (Doc. No. 1, at 9) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with respect to all federal law claims pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6); 3) All remaining claims are REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas for Cumberland County pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1447(c); and 4) The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case. s/ Yvette Kane YVETTE KANE, District Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?