Gow v. Dauphin County Prison et al

Filing 38

ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 37), of Magistrate Judge Saporito; 2. Defendant Dauphin County Prisons motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (Doc. No. 25), is GRANTED; 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter JUDGMENT in favor of the Defendant and against the Plaintiff; and 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the above-captioned case. 37 25 Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 10/14/16. (sc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ELSHAZALI GOW,
Plaintiff
v.
DAUPHIN COUNTY PRISON and
UNKNOWN PRISON GUARDS, as
individuals and in their capacity as
employees of the Dauphin County
Prison,
Defendants

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

No. 1:14-cv-02034

(Judge Kane)
(Magistrate Judge Saporito)

ORDER
Before the Court in the above-captioned case is the September 22, 2016 Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Saporito. (Doc. No. 37.) No timely objections have been
filed. ACCORDINGLY, on this 14th day of October 2016, upon review of the record and the
applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 37), of Magistrate Judge
Saporito;
2. Defendant Dauphin County Prison’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (Doc. No. 25), is GRANTED;
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter JUDGMENT in favor of the Defendant and
against the Plaintiff; and
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the above-captioned case.
s/ Yvette Kane
Yvette Kane, District Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania