Pepe v. Lamas et al

Filing 42

ORDER: 1. The M.J's report 36 is adopted except for the discussion dealing with the retaliation claim against dft Prevost.2. Based on the memorandum 41 accompanying this order, the retaliation claim against dft Prevost 32 is dismissed.3. B ased on the m.js recommendation, the claims against the following dfts are dismissed: Marirosa Lamas, R. Chism, Wally Dittsworth, L. McConnell,and Wilbert Matthews.4. The Clerk of Court shall close this file. Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 7/7/16. (ma)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DAVID WILSON PEPE,
Plaintiff
vs.
MARIROSA LAMAS, et al.,
Defendants

:
:
:
: CIVIL NO. 1:CV-14-2270
:
:
(Judge Caldwell)
:
:
:

ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of July, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants’
motion to dismiss (Doc. 32), the report (Doc. 36) and recommendations of the magistrate
judge, the objections of Plaintiff (Doc. 37), and the objections of Defendants (Doc. 38), it
is ordered that:
1. The magistrate judge’s report (Doc. 36) is adopted
except for the discussion dealing with the retaliation claim
against defendant Prevost.
2. Based on the memorandum accompanying this order,
the retaliation claim against defendant Prevost is dismissed.
3. Based on the magistrate judge’s recommendation, the
claims against the following defendants are dismissed:
Marirosa Lamas, R. Chism, Wally Dittsworth, L. McConnell,
and Wilbert Matthews
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this file.
/s/William W. Caldwell
William W. Caldwell
United States District Judge