Flemister v. Glunt et al

Filing 27

ORDER: In accord with the accompanying 26 ; 1. Petrs objns 25] to the r and r are OVERRULED.2. Judge Mehalchicks r and r 22 is APPROVED and ADOPTED.3. Vincent Lee Flemisters petn 1 for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED.4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED, as this court finds that petr has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 10/5/17. (ma)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA VINCENT LEE FLEMISTER, Petitioner v. DOC/STEVEN R. GLUNT, et al., Respondents : : : : : : : CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00187 ORDER AND NOW, this 5th day of October, 2017, upon consideration of Vincent Lee Flemister’s petition (Doc. 1) for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the thorough and well-reasoned report and recommendation (Doc. 22) of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick, and after consideration of petitioner’s objections (Doc. 25) to the report and recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Petitioner’s objections (Doc. 25) to the report and recommendation are OVERRULED. 2. Judge Mehalchick’s report and recommendation (Doc. 22) is APPROVED and ADOPTED, as supplemented by the accompanying memorandum. 3. Vincent Lee Flemister’s petition (Doc. 1) for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. 4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED, as this court finds that petitioner has not “made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. /s/ William W. Caldwell William W. Caldwell United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?