WILLIAMS v. TRITT et al

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS ORDERED THAT the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation 15 of Magistrate Judge Saporito. The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED with prejudice as u ntimely filed. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability, as the Petitioner has failed to demonstrate a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) and the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 5/18/17. (rw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LARRY MELTIER WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. BRANDY TRITT, Respondent : : : : : : : No. 1:15-cv-00367 (Judge Kane) (Magistrate Judge Saporito) ORDER Before the Court is the April 28, 2017 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Saporito (Doc. No. 15), in which he recommends dismissing Petitioner Larry Meltier Williams’ petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. 1), as untimely filed. No timely objections have been filed. ACCORDINGLY, this 18th day of May 2017, upon independent review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Saporito (Doc. No. 15); 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely filed; 3. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability, as the Petitioner has failed to demonstrate “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right,” see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); and 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. s/ Yvette Kane Yvette Kane, District Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?