Walsh v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT 17 of Magistrate Judge Schwab, directing Clrk of Ct to enter jdgmt in favor of pltf & against Commissioner - Comm's decision denying app for disability ins benefits of pltf Walsh VACATED & matter REMANDED to Comm w/ instructions to conduct new admin hrg, etc.,... & directing Clrk of Ct to CLOSE case. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 7/12/16. (ki)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOELLYN M. WALSH, Plaintiff v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-706 (Chief Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 12th day of July, 2016, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 17) of Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab, recommending that the court vacate the decision of the administrative law judge and remand the above-captioned matter for further proceedings with respect to the application for disability insurance benefits of pro se plaintiff Joellyn M. Walsh (“Walsh”), wherein Judge Schwab opines that the administrative law judge’s decision is not “supported by substantial evidence,” 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and finds specifically that the administrative law judge erred by failing to consider Walsh’s mental health condition, including diagnoses of anxiety and psychosis, in determining Walsh’s residual functional capacity, (see Doc. 17 at 23-27), and wherein Judge Schwab recommends that the matter be remanded to the administrative law judge for a new administrative hearing, (see id. at 27), and it appearing that neither Walsh nor the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) objects to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and that the Commissioner expressly waived the opportunity to do so, (see Doc. 18), and the court noting that failure to timely object to a magistrate judge’s conclusions “may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level,” Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)), but that, as a matter of good practice, a district court should “afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report,” Henderson, 812 F.2d at 878; see also Taylor v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 83 F. Supp. 3d 625, 626 (M.D. Pa. 2015) (citing Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Int’l, Inc., 702 F. Supp. 2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010)), in order to “satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record,” FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, and, following an independent review of the record, the court in agreement with Judge Schwab’s recommendation, and concluding that there is no clear error on the face of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The report (Doc. 17) of Magistrate Judge Schwab is ADOPTED. 2. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of plaintiff Joellyn M. Walsh and against the Commissioner as set forth in the following paragraph. 3. The Commissioner’s decision denying the application for disability insurance benefits of plaintiff Joellyn M. Walsh is VACATED. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner with instructions to conduct a new administrative hearing, develop the record fully, and evaluate the evidence appropriately in accordance with this order and the report (Doc. 17) of Magistrate Judge Schwab. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. /S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?