Rosembert v. Mahally et al

Filing 23

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 2254 is DENIED.2. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. SeeR. GOVERNING § 2254 CASES R. 11(a) (stating that [t]he districtcourt must issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters afinal order adverse to the applicant).3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. (eo)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALBERTO MELLON ROSEMBERT, Petitioner, : : : : v. : : SUPERINTENDENT LAWRENCE : MAHALLY, PENNSYLVANIA : STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, : Respondents. : 1:15-cv-0715 Hon. John E. Jones III ORDER January 3, 2016 NOW THEREFORE, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), and in accordance with the Court’s Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. 2. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. See R. GOVERNING § 2254 CASES R. 11(a) (stating that “[t]he district court must issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant”). 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. s/ John E. Jones III John E. Jones III United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?