Daniel v. Wetzel

Filing 91

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Saporito 79 ;2. Plaintiffs motion 71 for preliminary injunctive relief is DENIED;3. Defendants motion 50 for su mmary judgment is DENIED; 4. Defendants are directed to file an answer to the complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order; and 5. This matter is remanded to Magistrate Judge Saporito for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 4/11/17. (rw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DOYLE B. DANIEL, JR., a/k/a Kalonji Diop Cazembe, Plaintiff v. JOHN WETZEL, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : No. 1:15-cv-00850 (Judge Kane) (Magistrate Judge Saporito) ORDER Before the Court is the March 22, 2017 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Saporito. (Doc. No. 79.) No timely objections have been filed. ACCORDINGLY, on this 11th day of April 2017, upon independent review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Saporito (Doc. No. 79); 2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Doc. No. 71), is DENIED; 3. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 50), is DENIED; 4. Defendants are directed to file an answer to the complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order; and 5. This matter is remanded to Magistrate Judge Saporito for further proceedings. s/ Yvette Kane Yvette Kane, District Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?